Editorial: Cosmetic Surgery in the Academic Review Process
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cosmetic Surgery in the Academic Review Process
Has the academic review process become excessive? I describe a model in which reviewers who seek reputations with editors for high skill recommend the repair of mere blemishes as well as significant flaws. Reviewer signal-jamming is profitable if editors have trouble distinguishing the two, leading in equilibrium to insistence upon cosmetic surgery. Indeed, if there is a chance that blemishes a...
متن کاملEditorial: The JACMP review process
There is an old joke that goes something like: “Question: Why is the law like sausages? Answer: You don’t want to know how they are made.” Fortunately, JACMP manuscript review is different from both the law and sausage in that it doesn’t hurt for potential authors to understand how JACMP manuscript review is made, and how a manuscript goes through the process of review. The purpose of this edit...
متن کاملEditorial Changes in the Review Process
W e are adopting two changes in the review process at Marketing Science. The first change is the movement to a completely electronic review process. The second change is a different implementation of the double-blind review process that involves more anonymity for authors and slightly less anonymity for area editors (AEs). We hope that both changes will further enhance the attractiveness in pub...
متن کاملthe relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement in english and general subjects of the students of high school
according to research, academic self-concept and academic achievement are mutually interdependent. in the present study, the aim was to determine the relationship between the academic self-concept and the academic achievement of students in english as a foreign language and general subjects. the participants were 320 students studying in 4th grade of high school in three cities of noor, nowshah...
A Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Review of Financial Studies
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0893-9454,1465-7368
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhu093